Republicans in the Kansas Legislature are obviously not
serious at all about conservative principles and ideals. I am so incredibly
frustrated by what’s been transpiring in Topeka. I have half a mind to drive up
there and start slapping people. (But like an actual good conservative, I value
the rule of law and freedom, meaning I don’t want to go to jail for violating
some outdated law that makes it illegal to slap people with whom Gidget
disagrees –I think there’s a strong case for legalizing Gidget slaps, but I
digress.)
Legalize Gidget Slapping People Today! |
Sigh.
In theory, Republicans support eliminating unnecessary
spending and cutting the budget. The key words in that sentence are “in theory.”
In reality, Kansas has a lot of sacred cows, and perhaps none is more sacred
than propping up bloated public school administrations.
Supposedly conservative legislators, specifically in the
supposedly more conservative Kansas Senate, helped stick a fork in a bill that
would have consolidated Kansas schools. I get it. Truly, I do that
consolidating schools is gut-wrenching, unpopular work. But it is sooo
necessary, and I am not just saying that because I hail from the populated
Johnson County. I am saying that because math. Even public school students
should be able to do the math required to draw the conclusion that taxpayers
are spending buckets and buckets of hard-to-come-by cash on school
administrators. It’s ridiculous. It’s out of control. Kansas spends more than
50 percent of its budget on schools, the feds kick in additional money, and it’s
not improving our schools. Most of the money isn’t going to classrooms.
Instead, it’s lining the pockets of administrators.
There are 286 school districts in Kansas—each with its own
set of expensive superintendents and administrative staff. John Bradford’s
completely reasonable bill would have created countywide school districts in
several of Kansas’ less populous counties. For example, Harvey County’s four
small districts would likely merge with Newton schools for a district of about
6,000 students. This bill did not suggest closing any school buildings. Merging
districts may also provide the students of smaller districts access to things
they currently do not have. For example, a larger district comprised of smaller
ones IN THE SAME COUNTY could hire one Spanish teacher who travels between the
schools to teach Spanish (or insert other specialized training). The teacher
travels, not the students.
The last time the Kansas Legislature imposed school
consolidation, 1965, they created the Olathe School District from five school
districts. That year, the newly-minted Olathe School District No. 233 had an
enrollment of 3,687 students. Today, there are 29,567 students. What I’m saying
is, everyone continued to receive an education. Smaller schools continued to
exist within the behemoth Olathe School District. Savings were realized then and would be
again.
But rural Kansans sobbed big, fat baby tears and supposedly
conservative legislators surrendered like the French army in the face of mild
German aggression. It’s embarrassing. Before the bill even had a hearing, Sen.
Jake LaTurner, Pittsburg, and Sen. Garrett Love, Montezuma, took to their
Facebook pages lamenting the bill. These are Republicans who both say their key
concerns in Kansas are out-of-control spending and a high tax burden. That’s
what’s passing for conservative in the Statehouse this session – saying you
support less spending and lower taxes—while going out of your way to make sure
that doesn’t happen.
Republicans surrendering like the French Army in the face of mild German aggression. |
Supposed conservatives also threw tiny temper tantrums at
the mere suggestion that quite possibly, just maybe, we should quit
incentivizing additional funding for the gifted program. I have a lot of
problems with the way children are labeled repeatedly in public schools,
especially when there is financial incentive to label children. Newsflash:
There’s a YUUUGE financial incentive to label kids “special.”
I don’t like a
one-size-fits-all approach to education, but I think I like even less
bureaucrats labeling children. I have a real, real moral problem with it.
Expectations matter, and if one kid gets a better education because he or she
is “gifted,” if I am paying for all of it whether I want to or not, my
unlabeled kid should have access to it too. This isn’t purely a fiscal issue,
although the incentive for labeling school children rankles. It’s a moral
issue, too. If we’re going to have one-size-fits-all education, count me among
the all or nothing crowd.
Education is always a giant fly in the political Kansas
ointment. So I generally anticipate conservative legislators going off the
rails a bit where education is concerned. As a general rule, they have the
backbones of jellyfish. Unfortunately, in matters outside of education, this
year legislators are going full-on Bernie. (OK. That’s not exactly fair, but
they’re making large strides in Bernie’s direction in a lot of areas.
I give you the soon-to-be law sun tanning bill. Tanning
beds, you see, are BAD FOR YOU. So we desperately need big, bad government to
step in and save people from themselves through regulation of private business.
I know, you thought Republicans were opposed to over regulation, but nope. You’re
wrong in that assumption. They’re opposed to it right up until someone cries in
a committee hearing.
Skin cancer survivors, and former teen sun bed users, gave
emotional testimony. I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve used a
tanning bed so the big tanning controversy means absolutely nothing to me personally.
That said, we should either make tanning in a sunbed illegal OR require
parental consent for minors to tan. The current bill, which is likely to pass,
would make it illegal for people under the age of 18 to use tanning beds. If
tanning is legal, parents should make the decision – not 165 people in Topeka. That’s
the conservative position, which, it appears almost no one save for Brett
Hildebrand is taking.
Finally and most disturbingly and importantly, a bunch of
supposed Republicans jumped ship to oppose a change to the way Kansas Supreme
Court justices are appointed. The proposed constitutional amendment needed a
two-thirds majority. It failed in the House, 69 people voted appropriately. I
take serious umbrage with the idea that the current “merit selection” committee
is nonpartisan. That sentiment deserves its own laugh track. The legislation,
which would have gone before voters, would have given Kansas a federal model
appointment system in which the Governor offered a nomination to the Senate for
approval. Apparently the way the U.S. has been appointing federal judges is
backwards and ridiculous and stupid. Kansas allows a batch of attorneys to make
appointments to the bench. I don’t even… Please people, there’s a reason there’s
an entire genre of jokes dedicated to ways to drown, maim and otherwise injure
attorneys. Shockingly, a bunch of lawyers who get the high privilege of
nominating people to the bench think it’s a great idea for them to retain all
of the power. What I don’t understand is why so many Republicans went along.
Why do we bother? |
At this point, I can’t figure out why we even bother
electing Republicans or conservatives at any level of government. Someone
please explain the point, because I am losing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment